In all, I think he's got some valid points taught in an easy to tackle set of instructions. Granted to take him with some salt, but like I've mentioned in another thread, he's not completely full of shit. The techniques he mention in his books can and do work. I dunno, maybe I'm just a sucker.
I agree, mostly. I've read the first 5 books in the Temple set, and a couple of the others, but I constantly refer back to the practical work in the first one because the exercises
are effective
and useful.
Yes, one should take his writing with a huge grain of the old salt, however I think that should be a standard practice when reading anything pertaining to oogie-boogie 'occultism.'